[ octane ]
SEARCH  
   
 

Features  

 

Honda NSX

The great pretender

It’s been 20 years since the Honda NSX exploded onto the scene and proved that the Japanese knew a thing or two about making a very fast car. It gave Ferrari a bloody nose, too, thanks to a little F1 magic

Honda NSX

Honda NSX

 
Combine the engine and chassis and you really are left with a car that is capable of remarkable performance.
There’s something not quite right here. I’ve just attacked my favourite piece of B-road faster than I’ve done before in a mid-engined car. I’ve bounced off the limiter, turned in like a pro, and straightened the tightest corners – and yet there was no drama, no sweaty palms, and it all seemed so easy. Had I not been in an NSX, things might have been a lot messier.

But then, what else would you expect of a car created by the world’s most obsessive engineers and finessed by the hyper-sensitive F1 genius Ayrton Senna? The NSX was produced by a company whose ambition was encapsulated beautifully by the words of its founder, Soichiro Honda: ‘We only have one future, and it will be made of our dreams, if we have the courage to challenge convention.’ It was no empty soundbite.

Before the unveiling of the NSX at the 1989 Chicago Auto Show, no-one would have believed that Honda would introduce a car capable of beating Ferrari in a straight fight. Sure, Honda engines powered the McLarens that had dominated Formula One the previous year, and driven Williams to the Championship in ’87, but to produce a road car capable of the same? Improbable at best…

But building a supercar had been an integral part of Honda's plans since the early 1980s. When the company commissioned Pininfarina to produce a mid-engined concept car – which emerged as the HP-X in 1984 – it was as a mission statement of future intent; a preview of what was coming down the line.  
The chance to bestow F1 glamour on the mid-engined supercar was a marketing man’s dream, and the engineers also wanted to apply competition thinking to the new car. That meant a mid-mounted V6 and track-inspired handling; and between 1984 and 1989 the NSX took shape along these lines, with Honda’s boffins formulating their own take on the classic supercar package, so typified by the Ferrari 328GTB.

However, Honda didn’t believe in compromise. It wanted to produce a car as capable and exciting as the established players’ efforts. Why should those flaws that had blighted the mid-engined supercar breed for so long be tolerated? Why put up with poor visibility, a cramped cabin, heavy controls, challenging ergonomics and indifferent build quality? Why shouldn’t a driver used to a Civic be able to jump right in and get on with it? And with these questions posed, it set about answering them one by one, eliminating each of these compromises from the NSX.

As for the power unit, nothing short of excellence would do. Despite being designed in the middle of F1's turbo era, it was always going to be naturally aspirated for the purest throttle response and cleanest power delivery. The all-aluminium power unit had it all: 24 valves, four cams and the recently introduced VTEC variable valve timing system that pushed power to 270bhp at 7300rpm; close to 100bhp/litre.
Fast-forward to 1989 and the aftermath of its first European appearance at the Geneva Motor Show.

The press had been blown away by the appearance of the NSX (although it was called NS-X, with a hyphen, at the time), but remained cautious. They needn’t have worried, because it was the only road car with developmental input from Ayrton Senna.

The great driver was a Suzuka regular, and so when a McLaren testing session coincided with one of Honda’s in February ’89 the road car engineers were keen to get him behind the wheel and see what he thought. After a few laps in the 250bhp Legend-engined prototype, he came back with the feedback: ‘I'm not sure I can really give you appropriate advice on a mass-production car, but I feel it’s a little fragile.’

By that, he meant that the torsional rigidity of the body wasn’t up to par, and although Honda had built a shell as stiff as Ferrari and Porsche’s it still needed beefing-up. Honda went back to the drawing board and re-engineered the hull, making it 50% stiffer – even at this late stage in the NSX’s development Senna had made the difference. Impressed by his input, Honda invited him back to dial-in chassis improvements in the run-up to full production.

When the first journalists got behind the wheel of the same pre-production engineering prototype during the summer, they’d already been briefed that this wasn’t the finished article, but the scribes were blown away anyway. Car magazine’s Gavin Green grasped the significance of the NSX straight away in his first drive piece, entitled ‘Bullseye!’

Summing up, he wrote: ‘Honda has breached the gap between invigorating supercar and friendly sports car. It probably won’t cause Ferrari any worry, for no amount of Senna-Prost one-twos… It will bring a whole category of car into the reach of those who can’t afford Ferraris or Lamborghinis. The Japanese, it seems, have opened the door to Europe’s remaining automotive secret.’

Throughout 1989 and 1990 the NSX did much to raise Honda’s profile in the upper end of the market. This was especially true in the USA, where it proved a suitable flagship for its newly launched Acura sub-marque, Honda’s riposte to Lexus and Infiniti. Senna was given an NSX and generally used one during race weekends; most famously in the UK, where, during the run up to the British Grand Prix, he was pulled for speeding (was it in our car?) – and let off.

Sadly for Honda, all the positivity about the NSX wasn’t enough; the badge on its bonnet was a barrier to sales, just as Car feared it would be. Despite the rave reviews of the pre-production cars, and subsequent glowing reviews of the production version the following year (when it saw off the flawed Ferrari 348), sales were dismal.

During its 16-year production run Honda sold fewer than 20,000 NSXs, despite regular brush-ups and increasingly aggressive performance packages. First there was the TYPE-R in 1992 (again influenced by Senna), the targa-topped NSX-T in 1995, and then the TYPE-S in 1997 – and all were great cars for the Playstation generation. The engineers loved it, too: Gordon Murray benchmarked the NSX during McLaren F1 development, while Ferrari scurried back to the drawing board and transformed the 348 into the F355 as a direct consequence of the Honda’s brilliance.

Bookmark this post with:

 

0 Comment

Be the first to comment on this article

You need to register to post comments. Existing members can log in below to comment, otherwise click here to join.



 
  More FEATURES
 

Features

 

Columnists

 

Videos

 

Icons

 

The Knowledge

 

First Drives

 
 

SPONSORED LINKS

EMAIL TO A FRIEND   PRINT THIS
 
Honda NSX
  Honda NSX
  Honda NSX
Honda NSX
  Honda NSX
Honda NSX
  Honda NSX
Honda NSX
Continued

But in 2005 Honda pulled the plug, promising to build a follow-up car in time for its 20th anniversary. However, world events got in the way and the promised V10 sports car has been put on ice. Will we see its like again? Don’t bet against it.

If I were a gambling man, I’d bet that the last place you’d expect to find Senna’s car 20 years on would be Milton Keynes shopping centre in the dead of night, on the prowl as if it owned the place. But it seems perfectly fitting for our photographs: the town was a new arrival on the UK landscape during the ’60s, and soon challenged the south-east’s traditional centres of employment by doing things better, by being more intelligently thought out…

Personally, though, I want to hit the road and make the best use of the lightly trafficked midnight roads rather than kick my heels. But our photos come first, and as we perfect the setting I contemplate the Honda’s styling. It’s far from beautiful, of that there’s no doubt – the rear deck is too long, and the all-black cab-forward canopy looks just a little contrived. But what it doesn’t lack is presence – and while I’m idling around, plenty of people come over to ask questions.

Mainly along the lines of, ‘What is it?’ After what seems like an eternity, our shots are done, and it’s time to find out what all the fuss was about. The NSX has always held a fascination for me – it’s way beyond cool thanks to its engineering purity, and that’s more than evident once hunkered down in the low-slung driver’s seat. Unusually for a car of this era, the dash and centre console envelop you, and thanks to the wraparound (Group C-style) windscreen and rear window the visibility is fantastic.

Firing it up is joyful, too. The engine barks into life and settles into an even, sharp-edged idle. Blipping the throttle is too tempting to avoid but is actually disappointing, as it all sounds a bit ordinary. Our car, owned by Honda, is fitted with a four-speed automatic, so snicking it into Drive and setting off maintains the slightly disappointing aura of civility that the weighty steering does little to dispel.

However, it’s when leaving the new town and heading into the country that it all starts to come together and the magic happens. The steering, with variable power assistance, is full of feel, and stringing together a series of corners smoothly is seriously easy. The chassis is massively capable, too, with almost zero roll and maximum precision – and, just as Honda promised, it makes a hero out of an average driver. Does that make it boring? Far from it, because there’s so much communication on offer through the wheel, pedals, your behind.

Acceleration lacks drama when you leave the transmission in Drive – the gearing is long, and although it was a state-of-the-art self-shifter in 1989 there’s still laziness and lag to contend with. The change-up points on the retuned-for-auto engine are also on the low side – the VTEC engine really sings from 5500rpm, but keep your foot to the floor and it’s wanting to select the next gear just after 6000rpm; and that’s right in the heart of the power band.

Instead, hang on manually, stroke the 7500rpm limiter and you’ll experience a tingling, hard-edged V6 that wails like a racing car in full flight. It’s a cross between 911 and Dino Ferrari, but smoothed-out and refined. It’s not the sanitised effort the uninitiated may be expecting.

Combine the engine and chassis and you really are left with a car that is capable of remarkable performance. Of course, lots of supercars can stake the same claim, but none of the class of ’89 could do it so effortlessly – and leave average drivers feeling so special. And that makes it super-cool: anything capable of giving Ferrari a good drubbing on the road earns that right; but the fact that so few people bought one adds to the appeal of this engineering masterpiece.

I’m convinced already, but there’s no harm in hitting that B-road just one more time and striving for perfection…

 
 
 
 

SPONSORED LINKS

Two ways to read Octane